Vira Behavior
Sign inBook a demoStart building

USE CASE

AI policy enforcement

Keep hard company policy explicit when applications, workspaces, users, and sessions add narrower behavior preferences.

PROBLEM

A lower-scope preference can accidentally weaken a company rule when precedence is implicit or hidden inside prompt assembly.

OLD WORKFLOW

Teams append more prompt text, rely on ordering conventions, and discover conflicts only after runtime behavior changes.

EXAMPLE

A user's preferred tone may change how an answer is phrased, but it cannot disable a company escalation or legal requirement unless an explicit delegation permits that exact override.

VIRA WORKFLOW

Keep evidence, authority, evaluation, and release separate.

  1. 01

    Represent hard authority separately from ordinary preferences.

  2. 02

    Resolve the active binding chain for the current project and application context.

  3. 03

    Compose lower scopes only where parent authority permits them.

  4. 04

    Fail closed on unauthorized hard-policy weakening.

  5. 05

    Persist the composition result in runtime explainability evidence.

WHAT IS GOVERNED

  • Scope precedence
  • Delegation
  • Hard conflicts
  • Exact active revisions

WHAT IS MEASURED

  • Applied layers
  • Skipped layers
  • Conflict disposition
  • Runtime receipt identity

WHAT CAN FAIL

Failure states are part of the design.

  • Missing or ambiguous active deployment.
  • Cross-project or cross-environment binding.
  • Unauthorized weakening of a hard rule.